Back
19th Hole
Your stop for anything you'd otherwise chat about after a round. From travel tips to the best post-golf bar to fashion.
SEARCH FOR POSTS
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Start a Discussion
Architects as Iconic Musical Acts

The title really says it all. With a personal passion for music, I was thinking about this the other day and would love to hear what others have to say. My list will certainly lean towards my own musical tastes, so I'm interested in how things vary across personal preferences.

Off the top of my head, these are what I came up with:

  • Old Tom Morris --> Beethoven --> Largely credited with being the "founder" or the most influential early figure of their craft.
  • Alister MacKenzie --> The Beatles --> While certainly not the first to the scene, indisputably one of the greatest of all time in their field. Their outputs are some of the most well-known in history, and garner interest from people both inside and outside the industry. Both being British legends certainly helps.
  • C. B. MacDonald / Seth Raynor --> Bob Dylan --> Harnessed knowledge and expertise stemming from across the Atlantic. Changed how Americans perceived what this art could look and feel like.
  • Stanley Thompson --> The Tragically Hip --> An incredible body of work, oftentimes looked over due to being from the North.
  • Pete Dye --> Nirvana --> Came to the scene at an interesting time and when it needed some new energy. While a bit more challenging for some to understand / agree with, the talent cannot be argued.
  • Mike Stranz --> Grateful Dead --> Can't say I'm anything close to a Deadhead, but feel like followers and supporters of these two artists and their less conventional outputs are some of the most devout out there! This was honestly one of the first I thought of haha.
  • Tom Doak --> Oasis --> Young phenom(s) bursts on the scene. Confident in their abilities, often misunderstood and labelled as "arrogant" because of it. Thought of as a trailblazer who re-invented their craft, while bringing it forward to the next generation.
  • Gil Hanse --> Taylor Swift --> Already thought of as once-in-a-generation, at a relatively young age. Could have also been Doak if we wanted to play into the young phenom lens, but felt like Gil, similar to Taylor, has a bit less of a reputation for being "direct" and "arrogant". Putting those in quotes as they certainly aren't my personal opinion of Tom.

Kanye West instantly came to mind for Doak, but due to recent events don't really think that's super appropriate to relate against.

P.S. If you don't think Taylor Swift should be on this list, you should probably seek medical attention. And maybe some self-reflection.

The title really says it all. With a personal passion for music, I was thinking about this the other day and would love to hear what others have to say. My list will certainly lean towards my own musical tastes, so I'm interested in how things vary across personal preferences.

Off the top of my head, these are what I came up with:

  • Old Tom Morris --> Beethoven --> Largely credited with being the "founder" or the most influential early figure of their craft.
  • Alister MacKenzie --> The Beatles --> While certainly not the first to the scene, indisputably one of the greatest of all time in their field. Their outputs are some of the most well-known in history, and garner interest from people both inside and outside the industry. Both being British legends certainly helps.
  • C. B. MacDonald / Seth Raynor --> Bob Dylan --> Harnessed knowledge and expertise stemming from across the Atlantic. Changed how Americans perceived what this art could look and feel like.
  • Stanley Thompson --> The Tragically Hip --> An incredible body of work, oftentimes looked over due to being from the North.
  • Pete Dye --> Nirvana --> Came to the scene at an interesting time and when it needed some new energy. While a bit more challenging for some to understand / agree with, the talent cannot be argued.
  • Mike Stranz --> Grateful Dead --> Can't say I'm anything close to a Deadhead, but feel like followers and supporters of these two artists and their less conventional outputs are some of the most devout out there! This was honestly one of the first I thought of haha.
  • Tom Doak --> Oasis --> Young phenom(s) bursts on the scene. Confident in their abilities, often misunderstood and labelled as "arrogant" because of it. Thought of as a trailblazer who re-invented their craft, while bringing it forward to the next generation.
  • Gil Hanse --> Taylor Swift --> Already thought of as once-in-a-generation, at a relatively young age. Could have also been Doak if we wanted to play into the young phenom lens, but felt like Gil, similar to Taylor, has a bit less of a reputation for being "direct" and "arrogant". Putting those in quotes as they certainly aren't my personal opinion of Tom.

Kanye West instantly came to mind for Doak, but due to recent events don't really think that's super appropriate to relate against.

P.S. If you don't think Taylor Swift should be on this list, you should probably seek medical attention. And maybe some self-reflection.

3
March 4, 2026
St. Paddy's Day Libations in PHURST

Hey Fried Egg Heads,

Some pals and I are going to be staying at Pine Needles on St. Patrick's Day. Was hoping to crowd source some leads on the best place(s) to find a quality pint of Guinness and a good crowd in Southern Pines / Pinehurst.

Any and all tips much appreciated.

Hey Fried Egg Heads,

Some pals and I are going to be staying at Pine Needles on St. Patrick's Day. Was hoping to crowd source some leads on the best place(s) to find a quality pint of Guinness and a good crowd in Southern Pines / Pinehurst.

Any and all tips much appreciated.

February 25, 2026
Pinehurst Cradle advice

I am headed to Pinehurst for my second ever time in mid-March. We are playing Tobacco Road, Pine Needles, #5, and #3. The guy booking the trip did not book the Cradle ahead of time. I called this week and they're already booked up on the main afternoon we'd be able to play (3/14).

We should finish up our morning round around 1pm. I think our plan is to spend that afternoon just hanging around the Cradle area putting, hitting balls, people watching, etc.

I have read on various online forums that slipping the starter somewhere between $50-100 will get you on without a tee time. This may be a question for SGS golf advice, but should we try to grease some palms? Does that actually work? We can be flexible on timing since we're just hanging around that day. Thanks!



I am headed to Pinehurst for my second ever time in mid-March. We are playing Tobacco Road, Pine Needles, #5, and #3. The guy booking the trip did not book the Cradle ahead of time. I called this week and they're already booked up on the main afternoon we'd be able to play (3/14).

We should finish up our morning round around 1pm. I think our plan is to spend that afternoon just hanging around the Cradle area putting, hitting balls, people watching, etc.

I have read on various online forums that slipping the starter somewhere between $50-100 will get you on without a tee time. This may be a question for SGS golf advice, but should we try to grease some palms? Does that actually work? We can be flexible on timing since we're just hanging around that day. Thanks!



February 20, 2026
Edinburgh UK area hotels are pubs

Hello all,

Heading to the Open Championship and then going up north and thinking of staying in the Edinburgh area and playing a bunch of rounds. Anyone have a good place to stay and a few fun spot for a pint and some food.


Thanks


Hello all,

Heading to the Open Championship and then going up north and thinking of staying in the Edinburgh area and playing a bunch of rounds. Anyone have a good place to stay and a few fun spot for a pint and some food.


Thanks


March 2, 2026
PInehurst Trip (first time)

I'm heading to Pinehurst in mid-March for a 4-round package (#'s 4, 10, 2, 8 in that order). This is my first time to the resort/area, so looking for any tips, to-do's, course pitfalls, or anything anyone else wants to provide. We are staying on property in the Manor house.

Thanks in advance.

I'm heading to Pinehurst in mid-March for a 4-round package (#'s 4, 10, 2, 8 in that order). This is my first time to the resort/area, so looking for any tips, to-do's, course pitfalls, or anything anyone else wants to provide. We are staying on property in the Manor house.

Thanks in advance.

February 20, 2026
Central Illinois Sand Sites

I, my family, and friends will not receive money, shares, salary, or other tangible assets if these sites sold.


The two golf courses we had in Mason County, IL, closed 9 years ago.

I tell anyone who will listen, it makes no sense to me why we do not have a golf course. Got sand, got easy access to water, and have land with movement. Maybe I am delusional.

Are the sites good? Are the location and climate too much a hinderance? Could they attract play from Chicago,3-hour drive, in the spring and fall?


Thanks


Sand Type- The balance of both sites is the same type of sand found at Sand Valley

Water- Unconfined aquifer

Power- Accessible

Land Prices- $4000 - $6000 per acre for timber and prairie

Outlined Map Area- The same owner

Image hosting link

https://postimg.cc/gallery/XC7Fzbq


Site 1- Coordinates 40.247616, -89.966258


Site 2- Coordinates 40.158889, -89.967482

I, my family, and friends will not receive money, shares, salary, or other tangible assets if these sites sold.


The two golf courses we had in Mason County, IL, closed 9 years ago.

I tell anyone who will listen, it makes no sense to me why we do not have a golf course. Got sand, got easy access to water, and have land with movement. Maybe I am delusional.

Are the sites good? Are the location and climate too much a hinderance? Could they attract play from Chicago,3-hour drive, in the spring and fall?


Thanks


Sand Type- The balance of both sites is the same type of sand found at Sand Valley

Water- Unconfined aquifer

Power- Accessible

Land Prices- $4000 - $6000 per acre for timber and prairie

Outlined Map Area- The same owner

Image hosting link

https://postimg.cc/gallery/XC7Fzbq


Site 1- Coordinates 40.247616, -89.966258


Site 2- Coordinates 40.158889, -89.967482

1
February 17, 2026
SGS Reactions

Apologies if this thread already exists. I think it would be fun to have a place to react to SGS banter.

Apologies if this thread already exists. I think it would be fun to have a place to react to SGS banter.

February 24, 2026
Music Dump

I've been trying to listen to more music while working/driving/walking instead of having podcasts that I'm only half listening to but I find myself returning to old favorites. Trying my best to add new bands.

Any recommendations? I've been listening to a lot of The Teskey Brothers and St. Paul & The Broken Bones lately. They've been good finds.

I've been trying to listen to more music while working/driving/walking instead of having podcasts that I'm only half listening to but I find myself returning to old favorites. Trying my best to add new bands.

Any recommendations? I've been listening to a lot of The Teskey Brothers and St. Paul & The Broken Bones lately. They've been good finds.

February 12, 2026
Blake Conant’s Pod

Can Blake become a semi-regular pod guest? That was a refreshing amount of honest opinions!

Can Blake become a semi-regular pod guest? That was a refreshing amount of honest opinions!

6
February 1, 2026
Bandon Lottery Winner Expectations

Howdy folks,

Has anyone gone through the Bandon Lottery process in the past? Was fortunate enough to be selected for the June-October window of 2027 (starting in a balmy 1,832th spot). Does anyone know what all I'll book on this venture? Is it just lodging, or will they want to do tee time bookings as well? Just want to know what to expect when they finally get to me.

Thanks in advance!

Howdy folks,

Has anyone gone through the Bandon Lottery process in the past? Was fortunate enough to be selected for the June-October window of 2027 (starting in a balmy 1,832th spot). Does anyone know what all I'll book on this venture? Is it just lodging, or will they want to do tee time bookings as well? Just want to know what to expect when they finally get to me.

Thanks in advance!

January 28, 2026
Betting Against the House We Live In

Why Bryson DeChambeau's Kalshi Deal Represents Everything Wrong With Society’s Latest Grift

Bryson DeChambeau just became the first professional golfer to endorse a prediction market. Of course he did.

The self-proclaimed scientist, golf's most insufferable mix of pseudo-intellectualism and shameless opportunism, has signed with Kalshi to become their billboard. Complete with TV commercials and, most disturbingly, "the launch of markets on events he plays in."

If you're wondering how we got to a place where athletes can openly partner with platforms that let people bet on their own performances, with zero insider trading protections, while everyone in charge just shrugs, welcome to 2026. Where regulatory capture meets algorithmic manipulation meets artificial intelligence, and a guy who once tried to convince us he could science his way to golf dominance is now trying to convince us that turning sport into a betting market is innovation.

The Grand Bargain Nobody Made

Kalshi is a prediction market. That's the sanitized term for what is, functionally, a betting platform where you can wager on virtually anything. Press conference lengths. Whether Israel will start a nuclear war with Iran. Whether Bryson DeChambeau finishes in the top 20 at the Masters.

Brian Phillips at The Ringer recently explained the regulatory sleight of hand that made this possible. Kalshi convinced the government it wasn't a gambling platform but a derivatives market. This one classification unlocked everything: they can operate in states where sports betting is illegal, they face none of the scrutiny applied to actual sportsbooks, and, crucially, unlike stock markets that prohibit insider trading, derivatives markets have no such restrictions.

Let me repeat that: There is nothing stopping someone with direct knowledge of an outcome from betting on that outcome and taking your money.

Kalshi's CEO has said the promise of prediction markets "is to financialize everything and create a tradable asset out of any difference in opinion."

The explicit goal is to turn every aspect of human existence into something people can bet on, and more importantly, something insiders can manipulate for profit. And the people who could stop this, who should stop this, are instead partnering with them. CNN and CNBC both signed deals with Kalshi. The Golden Globes integrated Polymarket into their broadcast.

Why Bryson Is Perfect For This

Of course it's Bryson. The guy who rebranded himself as golf's great thinker, who talks about physics and science while demonstrating neither, who left the PGA Tour for LIV's blood money while claiming it was about "growing the game."

And now he's partnering with a platform that will create betting markets on his own performances. Not adjacent to them. Not theoretically related. Directly on them.

The implications are obvious to anyone who's thought about sports integrity for five minutes. Can you trust a guy with financial ties to a betting platform is trying his hardest on a random Sunday at a LIV event? When finishing T-27 instead of T-18 means nothing to his bank account but might mean hundreds of thousands to someone who knew it was coming? When every decision (lay up or go for it, aggressive line or conservative, one more practice putt or call it) has twenty plausible explanations?

But here's the thing: you don't even need actual corruption for this to be corrosive. The mere appearance of a conflict of interest destroys trust. And golf, more than most sports, runs on trust. There are no referees watching every shot. Players call penalties on themselves. The entire structure assumes everyone is competing on merit.

If the USGA and Augusta National and the R&A have any sense of institutional responsibility, they'd take a hard look at whether someone with direct financial ties to a betting platform (I mean predictions market) that creates markets on his performance should be welcome in their fields.

The Perfect Storm: Three Trends Converging at the Worst Possible Time

What makes this particularly dangerous isn't just prediction markets in isolation. It's that they're emerging at the exact moment when three massive tech trends are colliding, and nobody in a position of authority seems interested in pumping the brakes.

First: The gutting of content moderation. Social media platforms have systematically dismantled their safeguards against misinformation. Twitter is a disinformation playground. Meta fired most of its content moderation staff. There's no one watching the gates anymore.

Second: AI-powered manipulation at scale. Want to move a betting line? Generate a deepfake video showing Bryson limping after a practice round. Create fake text screenshots suggesting he's injured. Deploy bot networks to amplify the rumors across social platforms. The technology exists now, costs almost nothing, and gets more sophisticated every week.

Third: The prediction markets themselves. Which, as we've established, have no insider trading protections, accept anonymous cryptocurrency bets, and are being actively integrated into news coverage.

Here's how it could work: Someone places a massive bet against Bryson winning the U.S. Open. They generate and spread AI-created "evidence" of an injury or scandal. The rumors proliferate on unmoderated social platforms. Other traders see the odds shifting and pile on. The conspirators cash out. And maybe Bryson never even knows it happened until reporters start asking questions based on the fake news.

Or worse, the odds become the news. CNN and CNBC are using Kalshi data in their coverage. News shapes public perception, which shapes betting behavior, which appears as "data," which shapes more news. It's a closed loop where reality and perception blur, and somewhere in the middle, insiders extract money from the confused masses.

This already happens. The Times reports that someone using a brand-new crypto account bet $34,000 against very long odds on Venezuela's Maduro losing power, wagering most of it just hours before news of his capture broke. They walked away with $410,000. Similar suspicious trading patterns appeared around Trump's pardon of Binance founder Changpeng Zhao.

Kalshi claims to prohibit insider trading and checks trades against a database of "politically exposed people." But as Timothy Massad, who led the CFTC under Obama, told the Times: "It's very difficult for the platforms themselves to prevent this or the C.F.T.C. to prohibit it." The law is so vague it's virtually impossible to enforce.

And the people who should be regulating this, preventing this, stopping this? They're partnering with them instead. Major news networks. Awards shows. The president's son. And now, most pertinent to the audience reading this about sport, athletes themselves.

The Regulatory Vacuum

Traditional sportsbooks don't let athletes become spokespeople for betting on their own performances. There's a firewall, however imperfect, between competition and gambling. Athletes can't bet on their own sports. Regulations exist to maintain competitive integrity.

Prediction markets ignore all of that. They're not regulated as gambling. They're derivatives markets. Different rules. Fewer protections. And now they're paying athletes directly to promote betting on those same athletes' performances.

The counter-argument is that sports betting already exists, so what's the difference? The difference is oversight. The difference is separation. The difference is that we had, however imperfectly, some guardrails. Prediction markets are dismantling those guardrails while the people in charge either don't understand what's happening or don't care.

DraftKings and FanDuel (who we should also note have some pretty deplorable business practices) both launched prediction markets in December. More will follow. The money is too big. The technology is too powerful. The regulations are too weak. And nobody's stepping in to stop it.

Or Rather, The People Who Should Be Stopping It Are Getting Paid

Actually, it's worse than nobody stepping in. The people positioned to regulate these platforms are actively invested in them.

A New York Times report published today, January 15, 2026, reveals that Donald Trump Jr. is simultaneously an investor in and adviser to Polymarket, a paid adviser to Kalshi, and a director of Trump Media, which just announced its own prediction market platform called Truth Predict. He's literally advising the two biggest competitors in the space while his father's administration oversees their regulation.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which is supposed to police these markets, spent the Biden years trying to constrain them. Then Caroline Pham took over temporarily under Trump and said the agency had "unfairly constrained" prediction markets and needed to "back off." Both Kalshi and Polymarket's CEOs now sit on the CFTC's innovation council, helping shape policy on the very industry they profit from.

The timeline is damning: A week before Trump's inauguration, Kalshi hired Don Jr. as a strategic adviser. Four months later, the CFTC dropped its appeal of a ruling that had banned Kalshi from election betting. Polymarket was under investigation by both the FBI and CFTC. In July, both investigations closed. In August, Don Jr. invested in Polymarket and joined its advisory board. A week later, the CFTC issued a ruling that cleared obstacles for Polymarket to serve U.S. traders.

This isn't regulatory capture. This is regulatory demolition. The agencies meant to protect the public from predatory gambling are instead partnering with the gamblers, taking their advice, and clearing their legal obstacles. All while the president's son collects checks from multiple platforms and helps launch a competing one.

And now athletes like Bryson are free to sign deals that would have been unthinkable three years ago, because the people who could stop them are literally on the payroll.

The Exit Nobody's Looking For

Bryson DeChambeau is a cancer to the fabric of golf. Not because he hits it far or changed his body or plays on LIV. Because at every opportunity, he chooses the path that enriches himself while degrading the sport. The pseudo-intellectual act, the Saudi money, and now this, partnering with a platform designed to turn competition into content for betting markets.

He's the perfect avatar for this moment. The guy who talks about science while understanding nothing about institutional trust. Who claims to love golf while actively participating in its corruption. Who sees the future of sports as something to be financialized and extracted, and signs up to be the face of that extraction.

But Bryson's just a symptom. The disease is that the people who could stop this, who should stop this, are instead enabling it. The CFTC dropped its enforcement. Don Jr. is collecting checks from both major platforms while his father's administration clears their legal obstacles. News networks are integrating betting odds into their coverage. And nobody with actual power seems to think there's a problem.

This is happening in real-time. The momentum is all in the wrong direction. The money is too big. The technology is too powerful. The regulators have been captured. And the platforms have explicitly said their goal is to financialize everything.

When we look back in five years at how sports became indistinguishable from professional wrestling, how we stopped being able to trust what we were watching, we'll remember this moment. January 2026. When a guy who hits golf balls for a living became the first athlete to openly endorse betting on his own performances, while the president's son advised the platforms and the regulators looked the other way.

Complete with TV commercials.

I'd bet on it, but that feels like giving them what they want.

Sources:

Disclaimer:  I work for Fried Egg Golf but I am not a big J journalist.  I am not a little J journalist.  This post was not edited or revised by the editorial team at Fried Egg Golf.  I’m merely a human who is upset by the current trends that I see and am using this modest medium to get my thoughts out there.  These thoughts are my own and are not meant to be representative of the broader Fried Egg team.

Why Bryson DeChambeau's Kalshi Deal Represents Everything Wrong With Society’s Latest Grift

Bryson DeChambeau just became the first professional golfer to endorse a prediction market. Of course he did.

The self-proclaimed scientist, golf's most insufferable mix of pseudo-intellectualism and shameless opportunism, has signed with Kalshi to become their billboard. Complete with TV commercials and, most disturbingly, "the launch of markets on events he plays in."

If you're wondering how we got to a place where athletes can openly partner with platforms that let people bet on their own performances, with zero insider trading protections, while everyone in charge just shrugs, welcome to 2026. Where regulatory capture meets algorithmic manipulation meets artificial intelligence, and a guy who once tried to convince us he could science his way to golf dominance is now trying to convince us that turning sport into a betting market is innovation.

The Grand Bargain Nobody Made

Kalshi is a prediction market. That's the sanitized term for what is, functionally, a betting platform where you can wager on virtually anything. Press conference lengths. Whether Israel will start a nuclear war with Iran. Whether Bryson DeChambeau finishes in the top 20 at the Masters.

Brian Phillips at The Ringer recently explained the regulatory sleight of hand that made this possible. Kalshi convinced the government it wasn't a gambling platform but a derivatives market. This one classification unlocked everything: they can operate in states where sports betting is illegal, they face none of the scrutiny applied to actual sportsbooks, and, crucially, unlike stock markets that prohibit insider trading, derivatives markets have no such restrictions.

Let me repeat that: There is nothing stopping someone with direct knowledge of an outcome from betting on that outcome and taking your money.

Kalshi's CEO has said the promise of prediction markets "is to financialize everything and create a tradable asset out of any difference in opinion."

The explicit goal is to turn every aspect of human existence into something people can bet on, and more importantly, something insiders can manipulate for profit. And the people who could stop this, who should stop this, are instead partnering with them. CNN and CNBC both signed deals with Kalshi. The Golden Globes integrated Polymarket into their broadcast.

Why Bryson Is Perfect For This

Of course it's Bryson. The guy who rebranded himself as golf's great thinker, who talks about physics and science while demonstrating neither, who left the PGA Tour for LIV's blood money while claiming it was about "growing the game."

And now he's partnering with a platform that will create betting markets on his own performances. Not adjacent to them. Not theoretically related. Directly on them.

The implications are obvious to anyone who's thought about sports integrity for five minutes. Can you trust a guy with financial ties to a betting platform is trying his hardest on a random Sunday at a LIV event? When finishing T-27 instead of T-18 means nothing to his bank account but might mean hundreds of thousands to someone who knew it was coming? When every decision (lay up or go for it, aggressive line or conservative, one more practice putt or call it) has twenty plausible explanations?

But here's the thing: you don't even need actual corruption for this to be corrosive. The mere appearance of a conflict of interest destroys trust. And golf, more than most sports, runs on trust. There are no referees watching every shot. Players call penalties on themselves. The entire structure assumes everyone is competing on merit.

If the USGA and Augusta National and the R&A have any sense of institutional responsibility, they'd take a hard look at whether someone with direct financial ties to a betting platform (I mean predictions market) that creates markets on his performance should be welcome in their fields.

The Perfect Storm: Three Trends Converging at the Worst Possible Time

What makes this particularly dangerous isn't just prediction markets in isolation. It's that they're emerging at the exact moment when three massive tech trends are colliding, and nobody in a position of authority seems interested in pumping the brakes.

First: The gutting of content moderation. Social media platforms have systematically dismantled their safeguards against misinformation. Twitter is a disinformation playground. Meta fired most of its content moderation staff. There's no one watching the gates anymore.

Second: AI-powered manipulation at scale. Want to move a betting line? Generate a deepfake video showing Bryson limping after a practice round. Create fake text screenshots suggesting he's injured. Deploy bot networks to amplify the rumors across social platforms. The technology exists now, costs almost nothing, and gets more sophisticated every week.

Third: The prediction markets themselves. Which, as we've established, have no insider trading protections, accept anonymous cryptocurrency bets, and are being actively integrated into news coverage.

Here's how it could work: Someone places a massive bet against Bryson winning the U.S. Open. They generate and spread AI-created "evidence" of an injury or scandal. The rumors proliferate on unmoderated social platforms. Other traders see the odds shifting and pile on. The conspirators cash out. And maybe Bryson never even knows it happened until reporters start asking questions based on the fake news.

Or worse, the odds become the news. CNN and CNBC are using Kalshi data in their coverage. News shapes public perception, which shapes betting behavior, which appears as "data," which shapes more news. It's a closed loop where reality and perception blur, and somewhere in the middle, insiders extract money from the confused masses.

This already happens. The Times reports that someone using a brand-new crypto account bet $34,000 against very long odds on Venezuela's Maduro losing power, wagering most of it just hours before news of his capture broke. They walked away with $410,000. Similar suspicious trading patterns appeared around Trump's pardon of Binance founder Changpeng Zhao.

Kalshi claims to prohibit insider trading and checks trades against a database of "politically exposed people." But as Timothy Massad, who led the CFTC under Obama, told the Times: "It's very difficult for the platforms themselves to prevent this or the C.F.T.C. to prohibit it." The law is so vague it's virtually impossible to enforce.

And the people who should be regulating this, preventing this, stopping this? They're partnering with them instead. Major news networks. Awards shows. The president's son. And now, most pertinent to the audience reading this about sport, athletes themselves.

The Regulatory Vacuum

Traditional sportsbooks don't let athletes become spokespeople for betting on their own performances. There's a firewall, however imperfect, between competition and gambling. Athletes can't bet on their own sports. Regulations exist to maintain competitive integrity.

Prediction markets ignore all of that. They're not regulated as gambling. They're derivatives markets. Different rules. Fewer protections. And now they're paying athletes directly to promote betting on those same athletes' performances.

The counter-argument is that sports betting already exists, so what's the difference? The difference is oversight. The difference is separation. The difference is that we had, however imperfectly, some guardrails. Prediction markets are dismantling those guardrails while the people in charge either don't understand what's happening or don't care.

DraftKings and FanDuel (who we should also note have some pretty deplorable business practices) both launched prediction markets in December. More will follow. The money is too big. The technology is too powerful. The regulations are too weak. And nobody's stepping in to stop it.

Or Rather, The People Who Should Be Stopping It Are Getting Paid

Actually, it's worse than nobody stepping in. The people positioned to regulate these platforms are actively invested in them.

A New York Times report published today, January 15, 2026, reveals that Donald Trump Jr. is simultaneously an investor in and adviser to Polymarket, a paid adviser to Kalshi, and a director of Trump Media, which just announced its own prediction market platform called Truth Predict. He's literally advising the two biggest competitors in the space while his father's administration oversees their regulation.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which is supposed to police these markets, spent the Biden years trying to constrain them. Then Caroline Pham took over temporarily under Trump and said the agency had "unfairly constrained" prediction markets and needed to "back off." Both Kalshi and Polymarket's CEOs now sit on the CFTC's innovation council, helping shape policy on the very industry they profit from.

The timeline is damning: A week before Trump's inauguration, Kalshi hired Don Jr. as a strategic adviser. Four months later, the CFTC dropped its appeal of a ruling that had banned Kalshi from election betting. Polymarket was under investigation by both the FBI and CFTC. In July, both investigations closed. In August, Don Jr. invested in Polymarket and joined its advisory board. A week later, the CFTC issued a ruling that cleared obstacles for Polymarket to serve U.S. traders.

This isn't regulatory capture. This is regulatory demolition. The agencies meant to protect the public from predatory gambling are instead partnering with the gamblers, taking their advice, and clearing their legal obstacles. All while the president's son collects checks from multiple platforms and helps launch a competing one.

And now athletes like Bryson are free to sign deals that would have been unthinkable three years ago, because the people who could stop them are literally on the payroll.

The Exit Nobody's Looking For

Bryson DeChambeau is a cancer to the fabric of golf. Not because he hits it far or changed his body or plays on LIV. Because at every opportunity, he chooses the path that enriches himself while degrading the sport. The pseudo-intellectual act, the Saudi money, and now this, partnering with a platform designed to turn competition into content for betting markets.

He's the perfect avatar for this moment. The guy who talks about science while understanding nothing about institutional trust. Who claims to love golf while actively participating in its corruption. Who sees the future of sports as something to be financialized and extracted, and signs up to be the face of that extraction.

But Bryson's just a symptom. The disease is that the people who could stop this, who should stop this, are instead enabling it. The CFTC dropped its enforcement. Don Jr. is collecting checks from both major platforms while his father's administration clears their legal obstacles. News networks are integrating betting odds into their coverage. And nobody with actual power seems to think there's a problem.

This is happening in real-time. The momentum is all in the wrong direction. The money is too big. The technology is too powerful. The regulators have been captured. And the platforms have explicitly said their goal is to financialize everything.

When we look back in five years at how sports became indistinguishable from professional wrestling, how we stopped being able to trust what we were watching, we'll remember this moment. January 2026. When a guy who hits golf balls for a living became the first athlete to openly endorse betting on his own performances, while the president's son advised the platforms and the regulators looked the other way.

Complete with TV commercials.

I'd bet on it, but that feels like giving them what they want.

Sources:

Disclaimer:  I work for Fried Egg Golf but I am not a big J journalist.  I am not a little J journalist.  This post was not edited or revised by the editorial team at Fried Egg Golf.  I’m merely a human who is upset by the current trends that I see and am using this modest medium to get my thoughts out there.  These thoughts are my own and are not meant to be representative of the broader Fried Egg team.

9
January 16, 2026
Emergency Florida Golf Trip on Short Notice

Fellow fried eggs - I am planning a golf trip with a buddy for next month and am looking for tips. First choice is Streamsong, but interested if folks have thoughts on something more creative (e.g., get Air BnB and play a few different courses). I'm city agnostic and am really just interested in the best / most convenient golf. Thanks!

Fellow fried eggs - I am planning a golf trip with a buddy for next month and am looking for tips. First choice is Streamsong, but interested if folks have thoughts on something more creative (e.g., get Air BnB and play a few different courses). I'm city agnostic and am really just interested in the best / most convenient golf. Thanks!

January 13, 2026
Austin, TX Recos

Hey folks! I'll be in Austin, TX in late Feb and I managed to arrange my work schedule to sneak in a round of golf. I've done some Googling and have a short list, but wondered if any one on here has any must plays. Let me know!

Hey folks! I'll be in Austin, TX in late Feb and I managed to arrange my work schedule to sneak in a round of golf. I've done some Googling and have a short list, but wondered if any one on here has any must plays. Let me know!

1
January 15, 2026
Big Island Course Recs

I'll have time for one round while on the Big Island and am torn on which course to choose. Outside of Nanea (definitely not well connected enough for that one!), curious if anyone has thoughts on the obvious public choices (Mauna Kea, Mauna Lani North, or Mauna Lani South) or if there are others I should consider?

I'll have time for one round while on the Big Island and am torn on which course to choose. Outside of Nanea (definitely not well connected enough for that one!), curious if anyone has thoughts on the obvious public choices (Mauna Kea, Mauna Lani North, or Mauna Lani South) or if there are others I should consider?

2
January 9, 2026
Going to see a DP World Tour Event

Morning FEGC! I'm curious if any North American fans have been to a DP world tour event. I'm thinking about going to the KLM Open in June and it would be my first time going to an international golf event. Has anyone made the trip over? Was it easy to do, what was the experience like? Thanks in advance.

Morning FEGC! I'm curious if any North American fans have been to a DP world tour event. I'm thinking about going to the KLM Open in June and it would be my first time going to an international golf event. Has anyone made the trip over? Was it easy to do, what was the experience like? Thanks in advance.

January 12, 2026
No results found.
Members Pro shop
Shop exclusive Fried Egg Golf Club member merchandise
Explore
INTERNATIONAL TRIP PLANNING
Plan the trip of a lifetime with the help of an expert from the Fried Egg team
Explore
EVENTS
FEGC members get early and exclusive access to Fried Egg Events and Experiences
Explore